2003 Spring Wheat Culitvars
(2002 Field Data)

Performance Evaluation and Recommendations

Revised March 2003

All linked publications are available in a PDF format, viewable only with Adobe Acrobat Reader. This software is free. Click here to download it.

Table of Contents

Authors
Spring Wheat and Durum Wheat Varieties Recommended for Montana by District
Spring Wheat Variety Performance Summary for Montana:
- Comparable average - page 1
- Rates and dates of seeding - page 2
- Cultural practices - page 2
- Variety Testing Procedures - page 3
Spring Wheat Variety Comparisons:
- District 1 - Kalispell - High Rainfall
- District 2 - Bozeman - Dryland
- District 2 - Bozeman - Irrigated
- District 3 - Huntley - Dryland
- District 3 - Huntley - Irrigated
- District 4 - Moccasin - Dryland
- District 5 - Havre - Dryland
- District 5 - Conrad - Dryland
- District 6 - Sidney - Recrop
- District 6 - Sidney - Irrigated
Soft White Wheat Comparisons
Durum Comparisons:
- District 2 - Bozeman - Dryland
- District 3 - Huntley - Dryland
- District 4 - Moccasin - Dryland
- District 5 - Conrad - Dryland
- District 5 - Conrad - Irrigated
- District 5 - Havre - Dryland
- District 6 - Sidney - Recrop
- District 6 - Sidney - Irrigated

Variety Descriptions: - page 9
- Hard Red Spring Wheats
  - Amidon, Conan, Ernest, Express, Fergus, Fortuna
  - Grandin, Hank, Hi-Line, Len, Lew, McNeal, Newana,
  - Reeder, Scholar, WestBred 926, WestBred 936
- Soft White Spring Wheats
  - Penawawa, Vanna
Durum Variety Descriptions - page 12
- Durum
  - Ben, Kyle, Lebsock, Lloyd, Maier, Medora, Monroe, Mountrail,
  - Munich, Plaza, Plenty, Renville, Utopia, Vic, Ward, WestBred Laker